1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar


Comparing Athena Firewall Grader to Nipper

Athena's Firewall Grader provides a normalized score for complexity based on a comparison of your firewall against a library of several hundred pre-analyzed firewalls.

Nipper does not offer a comparison against other firewalls. The rule by rule output does not consider all 12 dimensions of complexity represented in the rolled-up counts provided by FirewallGrader.

The table below shows how the complexity factors are displayed differently by both tools. To get an automated high-level view of complexity, all the factors below must be taken into account. Factors such as address and service elements, as well as expanded ACL rules, play a decisive role in complexity even when other factors have seemingly low counts.

Since Nipper cannot calculate these factors, any assessment based on Nipper's reports alone requires significant expert judgment. FirewallGrader provides scoring for a quick and objective high-level assessment that can be run multiple times with consistent results.

Complexity Factors Firewall Grader Nipper
Total rules Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
ACL Rules Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
NAT Rules Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
Address Elements Rolled-up Count Not Handled *
Service Elements Rolled-up Count Not Handled *
Interfaces Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
VPN Connections Rolled-up Count Not Handled
Number of expanded ACL rules Rolled-up Count Not Handled
Rules with ANY service Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
Rules with ANY source or destination address Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
Rules with ANY service and ANY src/dst address Rolled-up Count Rule Listing
Total Deny Rules Rolled-up Count Rule Listing

* Nipper provides the address or service object definitions which are different from the unique address or service elements referenced in the rules.